1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee structure problems

“TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1996 JEEP GRAND CHEROKEE. WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 50 MPH, THE VEHICLE SHOOK UNCONTROLLABLY. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 450,000. UPDATED 12/01/16*LJ”

“1996 JEEP GRAND CHEROKEE. CONSUMER SEEKS REIMBURSEMENT FOR TRAILER HITCH INSTALLATION RECALL NOTICE. CONSUMER HAS ANOTHER VEHICLE COMPLAINT IN ARTEMIS. *SMD CHRYSLER CLAIMED THE CONSUMER WAS NOT ENTITLED TO REIMBURSEMENT, BECAUSE A MOPAR HITCH WAS NOT INSTALLED ON THE VEHICLE. BUT INSTEAD, THE CONSUMER HAD U-HAUL INSTALL A HEAVY DUTY HITCH AFTER BEING INFORMED BY CHRSYLER HE WOULD BE REIMBURSED. *JB”

“SEVERE RUST ALL OVER THE BODY BUT ESPECIALLY ON THE FRAME. HAVE HAD MULTIPLE COMPONENTS FAIL AND CRACK, NOW TAKING IN WATER THROUGH CORNERS OF THE ROOF THROUGH RUST HOLES. PASSENGER SIDE OF FRAME LIKELY TO SEVER UNDER FURTHER DRIVING. RUST ON THE BRACKETS HOLDING THE FUEL TANK TO THE VEHICLE CREATED A HOLE IN THE FUEL TANK. PART WAS REPLACED, NO PICTURE.”

“TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1996 JEEP GRAND CHEROKEE. WHILE HAVING THE VEHICLE SERVICED BY AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC, THE TECHNICIAN NOTIFIED THE CONTACT THAT THE FRAME WAS EXHIBITING RUST. THE INDEPENDENT MECHANIC CONFIRMED THAT THERE WAS RUST ON THE FRAME AND STATED THAT IT NEEDED TO BE REPAIRED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE ISSUE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 174,000.”

“1996 JEEP GRAND CHEROKEE. CONSUMER WRITES IN REGARDS TO REPLACEMENT PARTS NOT AVAILABLE TO COMPLETE REAR STRUCTURE REINFORCEMENT RECALL NOTICE. *SMD RECALL # 13V252000. *JB MA 09/22 UPDATED 01/04/16.*JB”

“TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1996 JEEP GRAND CHEROKEE. THE CONTACT RECEIVED NOTIFICATION OF NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBER: 13V252000 (FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE, STRUCTURE); HOWEVER, THE PART NEEDED TO DO THE REPAIR WAS UNAVAILABLE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE MANUFACTURER EXCEEDED A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF TIME FOR THE RECALL REPAIR. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE ISSUE. THE CONTACT HAD NOT EXPERIENCED A FAILURE.”